Legal Opinion
Chaddock v. Day
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1889PublishedCited by 26 opinions
Application for mandamus to compel respondent to entertain a complaint and issue a warrant for the violation of a village ordinance. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
Application for mandamus.
April 17, 1882, the president and board of trustees of the-village of Allegan adopted the following by-law, being No» 16 of the by-laws of said village:
“ It shall not be lawful for any person to sell or offer for sale, on any street in the village of Allegan, any fresh meat of any animal, in pieces or quantities less than one-quarter of any such animal, without first paying into the village treasury the sum of ten dollars in advance for each month, and obtaining from the clerk a permit for such sale. Any person violating any of the provisions of this by-law shall, on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gale v. Village of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Ash v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Barling v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Bush v. SeaburyNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- City of Chicago v. BarteeIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- City of Grand Rapids v. BraudyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Stull v. De MattosWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Trio Distributor Corp. v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.