Frese v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Writ of Error to tlíe Circuit Court for Hernando county. 'The facts of the ease are stated in. the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Raney
1. The plaintiff in error was convicted at the fall term, "1885, of the Hernando Circuit Court, of carrying on the 'business of a dealer in spirituous liquors without haviug -obtained a State license.
It is contended that the offence is barred by the statute ■ of limitations as it was not committed within one year before the filing of the information upon which the trial was had. The 78th section of the act of July 10th, 1832, (p. -435 of McClellan’s Digest,) “an act relating to crimes and misdemeanors,” provides that all offences not punishable with death shall be prosecuted within two years…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. DanforthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Jamieson v. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Baeumel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.