Legal Opinion

Booe v. Sims

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 14, 1919PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Prairie Chancery Court, Northern District; JolmM. Elliott, Chancellor; 1. The act was never properly passed by the Legislature as the Constitution requires. Art. 5, seos. 21-22. 2. The description 2-36 only embraces the two sections and the act is void for uncertainty. 122 Ark. 491; 105 Id. 380; Standard Diet.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Prairie Chancery Court, Northern District; JolmM. Elliott, Chancellor; 1. The act was never properly passed by the Legislature as the Constitution requires. Art. 5, seos. 21-22. 2. The description 2-36 only embraces the two sections and the act is void for uncertainty. 122 Ark. 491; 105 Id. 380; Standard Diet. (20 ed.), “Hyphen.” 3. The improvements are not connected, as there is a gap of at least a mile between them and the improvements are too remote from each other, etc. 118 Ark. 294. 4. The act fixing the southern boundary line is indefinite and uncertain, as the Chicago, Bock…

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

The issues presented by the pleadings in this case involve the validity of an act of the General Assembly of 1919 (Act No. 302) creating road improvement district, designated as the Des Arc-Hazen Road Improvement 'District of Prairie County.(1) It is contended that the act is void because, after the act was read the first and second times in the Senate, the first two pages were extracted and two pages substituted for them, which had not been approved by the Senate. In determining whether an act has been properly passed by both houses of the General Assembly the court will not look beyond the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harrington v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Sallee v. DaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Heinemann v. SweattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Chicot County v. DaviesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  5. Rayder v. WarrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adams v. SpillyardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Capps v. Judsonia & Steprock Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Road Improvement District No. 16 v. SaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Huff v. UdeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API