Sorkin v. The Kroger Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ADAM SORKIN, individually and on behalf ) of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) 23 C 14916 v. ) ) THE KROGER CO., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES P. KOCORAS, District Judge: Plaintiff Adam Sorkin, like many others, is concerned about the ethical treatment of farm animals. When he purchased eggs at the grocery store, he opted for a more expensive brand of eggs labeled and packaged as “Farm Fresh Eggs,” envisioning “hens living on farms, with open green space, grass, hay and straw,” “pecking…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.