Legal Opinion

Sorkin v. The Kroger Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 6, 2024No. 1:23-cv-14916Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ADAM SORKIN, individually and on behalf ) of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) 23 C 14916 v. ) ) THE KROGER CO., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES P. KOCORAS, District Judge: Plaintiff Adam Sorkin, like many others, is concerned about the ethical treatment of farm animals. When he purchased eggs at the grocery store, he opted for a more expensive brand of eggs labeled and packaged as “Farm Fresh Eggs,” envisioning “hens living on farms, with open green space, grass, hay and straw,” “pecking…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API