Legal Opinion

Cheuvront v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-1268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, District Judge.

This is an action under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, as amended, and the general maritime law, based on negligence and unseaworthiness of a vessel. The case has been tried to the Court nonjury by stipulation of counsel. Pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the following findings of fact and conclusions of law are entered.

Findings of Fact

Plaintiff, George Cheuvront, was born October 15, 1944. He holds a bachelor’s degree from Geneva College; he also has a temporary teaching certificate. He has worked irregularly as a substitute teacher…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Thomas W. Griffith v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation and American Commercial Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gajewski v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Kirk v. Allegheny Towing Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Yost v. Union RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Miron v. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1988
  5. Benders v. Board of Governors for Higher EducationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API