Legal Opinion
Doe v. Pataki
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 12, 2006No. 96 Civ. 1657(DC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
This case was brought by plaintiffs more than a decade ago to challenge the constitutionality of the New York State Megan’s Law, the Sex Offender Registration Act (the “Act”). After extensive litigation and settlement negotiations, the parties entered into a stipulation of settlement on June 2, 2004, which was “so ordered” by this Court on June 4, 2004 (the “Stipulation”).
The Stipulation provided that sex offenders who were covered by the case and who were at risk levels 1 and 2 would be subject to registration for ten years from the date they first registered,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- People v. CintronNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- People ex rel. Morse v. BerbaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. RomanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.