Legal Opinion
People v. Cintron
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 2006PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Megan Tallmer, J.
The above-captioned cases are joined together for decision. The five named petitioners seek to be relieved of the obligation to register as sex offenders pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act1 (hereinafter referred to as SORA). Each petitioner claims that SORA is unconstitutional as applied to him.2 The People oppose petitioners’ applications for exemption from the registration requirements of SORA. The New York State Attorney General’s office was notified of the Jackson and Cintron motions and declined to take a position.
The Facts
Eliezer Cintron…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Moffitt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
- People v. CintronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.