Legal Opinion

Doe v. Pataki

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 18, 2006No. 1:96-CV-1657 DCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CHIN, District Judge.

On April 12, 2006, I issued an opinion granting plaintiffs’ motion to enforce the stipulation of settlement (the “Stipulation”) entered in this case. I held that the amendments to the Sex Offender Registration Act (the “Act”) signed into law in January 2006 — extending the ten-year registration period to twenty years for level 1 offenders and life for level 2 offenders — ■ could not be applied to individuals who were covered by the Stipulation. Doe v. Pataki 427 F.Supp.2d 398 (S.D.N.Y.2006). I concluded that defendants were bound to their agreement, as embodied in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API