Baker v. Cazort
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Crawford. Circuit Court; Jeptha H. Evans, Judge; No abstract was filed as required by Rule 9, and cause should be affirmed. 57 Ark. 304; 58 Id. 448; 59 Id. 1; 76 Id. 217; 78 Id, 577; 80 Id. 259; 82 Id. 547; 83 Id. 356.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
G. T. Cazort instituted this action in the Crawford Circuit Court to enforce a specific attachment on two mares, which-he alleged he had sold to T. B. Baker and A. E. Baker. No service of summons was had upon A. E. Baker, and the case proceeded against T. B. Baker alone.
After the evidence was introduced, the court told the jury that the facts were undisputed, and that the only question about which there was any contention was whether or not T. B. Baker became a purchaser of the mares within the meaning of our law authorizing this character of suit. The note or obligation given for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shorter University v. FranklinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BoylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Neal v. BrandonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Merritt v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Wallace v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hubbert v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918