Hubbert v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Pike Circuit Court; J. S. Lake, Judge; The complaint states a cause of action and the court had jurisdiction. Citing cases. Argue the merits of the cause which are not passed on by the court. 1. The judgment should be affirmed for failure to comply with Rule 9. 2. Argue the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.
Appellants filed a purported abstract in this case. It is stated in the abstract that “this appeal is taken from a judgment of the circuit court rendered on the 20th day of March, 1918, Pike County, Arkansas, sustaining a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
It is insisted by appellee that the judgment should, be affirmed because appellants have made no abstract or abridgment of the transcript in compliance with rule 9 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. That part of rule 9 referred to by appellee is as follows:
“In all civil cases, the appellant shall file with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shorter University v. FranklinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BoylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- De Queen & Eastern Railway Co. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Neal v. BrandonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Merritt v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grimes v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924