Neal v. Brandon
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from St. Francis Circuit Court. The court destroyed its jurisdiction by striking out the defendant’s pleas and |denying defendant a hearing. 93 U. S. 274; 29 Ark. 81; 2 Estee, PI. § 3274; 6 Ark. 250; Sand. & H. Dig. § 5820. Appellant’s abstract presents nothing for this court to consider. 55 Ark. 547; 57 Ark. 304; 58'Ark. 448; 59 Ark. 1.
1Opinion of the CourtHirr, C. J.
1. Neal executed a mortgage to Brandon & Baugh on three mules, and they brought replevin for the mules after default, and issues were raised as to the indebtedness secured by the mortgage, and other, matters. After a judgment in favor of Brandon & Baugh, an appeal was taken to this court, and the judgment reversed. Neal v. Brandon, 70 Ark. 79.
On the remand of the case, it was tried upon the issue as to whether Neal was indebted to Brandon & Baugh; if so, what amount. Included in the account in controversy was an account for which it was alleged on one side, and denied on the other, that Neal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Koch v. KimberlingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- Neal v. BrandonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- Ruble v. HelmSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Savage v. LichlyterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shorter University v. FranklinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Jett v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Carpenter v. HammerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Keller v. SawyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Thomson v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.