Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1996No. 95-273PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Andrew Johnson appeals from the district court’s order which denied his petition for an order nunc pro tunc. Appellant sought to have vacated the portion of his earlier imposed judgment and sentence which required him to pay a $50 surcharge to the crime victims’ compensation account.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Appellant presents one issue for our review:

Did the trial judge err in denying appellant’s petition for [an] order nunc pro tunc?

FACTS

Appellant was convicted in 1989 of aggravated burglary and first-degree sexual assault. The jury also found that he was a habitual criminal.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frenzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Christensen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hamburg v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Seaton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dolence v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Heinemann v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Ryan Alexander Brown v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Hultgren v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. David Wayne Hembree v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API