Legal Opinion
Hardesty v. Kroger Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 1, 2020No. 1:16-cv-00298Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI HARDESTY, et al., : Case No. 1:16-cv-298 Plaintiffs, Judge Matthew W. McFarland v THE KROGER CO., et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 76) This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ partial motion for summary judgment (Doc. 76). Plaintiffs Joseph Hardesty, Madeline Hickey, Derek Chipman, and the 24 collective action members they represent (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) seek summary judgment on two issues: (1) the liability of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- George McClanahan and William Clinger v. William B. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Wendy Elwell, Plaintiff-Appellee v. University Hospitals Home Care Services, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Anthony Martin v. Indiana Michigan Power Company, D/B/A American Electric PowerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Glynn Douglas, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Argo-Tech Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.