Legal Opinion
Mulitauaopele v. Maiava
High Court of American Samoa
Decided August 2, 1993No. CA No. 73-93Published
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus:
On July 13, 1993, Alamoana S. Mulitauaopele petitioned for a writ of mandamus to require the Acting Territorial Auditor and the Territorial Audit Office to audit alleged overexpenditures and misuse of public funds by the House of Representatives of the Legislature of American Samoa. On July 21, 1993, proceedings were suspended, pending compliance with the service and proof of service requirements under T.C.R.C.P. Rule 91 and the complete filing of requisite documents under T.C.R.C.P. Rule 89. With substantial compliance with these court rules…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.