Legal Opinion
United States v. Cotto Aponte
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 21, 1994No. 93-1287PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, BOUDIN and STAHL, Circuit Judges.
CYR, Circuit Judge.
■ Following a two-day jury trial, appellant Emilio Cotto Aponte (“Cotto”) was convicted of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1993). On appeal, he challenges two eviden-tiary rulings and the sufficiency of the evidence. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
The challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence requires that we assess all evidence, draw all reasonable inferences, and resolve all credibility determinations in the light most favorable to the verdict. United States v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. NasonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. FahmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Anne Onujiogu, Etc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Giovanni CastielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ralph H. CartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. TutivenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MarderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rodriguez-SolerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Cruz QuilanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.