Eaton v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Western Oil and Gas Company, defendant below, filed a motion in the district court to dismiss petitioners’ complaint. The motion contended that Nevada courts lack both in rem and in personam jurisdiction in the case. The motion also contended that the doctrine of forum non conveniens mandated dismissal. The district court dismissed the case, finding that “Montana is a much more convenient place to litigate this matter.” Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to vacate the dismissal.
In Buckholt v. District Court, 94 Nev. 631, 584 P.2d 672 (1978), we suggested…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Buckholt Ex Rel. Buckholt v. Second Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. Swisco, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1963
4Cited by10 opinions
- Pan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Pan v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Kedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Mountain View Recreation, Inc. v. Imperial Commercial Cooking Equipment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Payne v. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DIST. COURT, ETC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.