Legal Opinion

Kedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 9, 2008No. 2005-332-M.P., 2005-319-M.PPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SUTTELL, for the Court.

We issued a writ of certiorari to consider the applicability of the doctrine of forum non conveniens in Rhode Island jurisprudence. The petitioners/defendants sought review of Superior Court orders denying their motions to dismiss in thirty-nine civil actions filed in Rhode Island by Canadian residents. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we join forty-six of our sister states and the federal courts by formally recognizing the doctrine of forum non conveniens. We vacate, therefore, the orders of the Superior Court.

I

Facts and Procedural History

The…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cortez v. Palace Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Sidell v. SidellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. Saunders v. SaundersWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Valerie M. (McAndrew) Hogan v. Philip A. McAndrewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API