Kedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SUTTELL, for the Court.
We issued a writ of certiorari to consider the applicability of the doctrine of forum non conveniens in Rhode Island jurisprudence. The petitioners/defendants sought review of Superior Court orders denying their motions to dismiss in thirty-nine civil actions filed in Rhode Island by Canadian residents. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we join forty-six of our sister states and the federal courts by formally recognizing the doctrine of forum non conveniens. We vacate, therefore, the orders of the Superior Court.
I
Facts and Procedural History
The…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Cortez v. Palace Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Sidell v. SidellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Saunders v. SaundersWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Valerie M. (McAndrew) Hogan v. Philip A. McAndrewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.