Legal Opinion

Edwards X-Ray Co. v. Ritter Dental Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodenbeck, J.:

The general rule is that words, among others, are slanderous per se which directly “ tend to the prejudice of any one in his office, profession, trade or business ” or are an “ injurious imputation ” affecting his office, profession or business (Gideon v. Dwyer, 87 Hun, 246, 249; Folkard’s Starkie on Libel & Slander [Wood’s Notes], pp. 105, 177; Panster v. Wasserman, 190 App. Div. 822, 823), or affect his “ standing, honesty and reliability ” in his business (Brown v. Tregoe, 236 N. Y. 497, 502), in which cases no special damages are required to be alleged or proven. This is one…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. . FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Sanderson v. . CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charles Parker Co. v. Silver City Crystal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Kforce, Inc. v. Alden Personnel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. Mildenberger v. FlemmingNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Phelan v. RheinsteinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API