Edwards X-Ray Co. v. Ritter Dental Manufacturing Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rodenbeck, J.:
The general rule is that words, among others, are slanderous per se which directly “ tend to the prejudice of any one in his office, profession, trade or business ” or are an “ injurious imputation ” affecting his office, profession or business (Gideon v. Dwyer, 87 Hun, 246, 249; Folkard’s Starkie on Libel & Slander [Wood’s Notes], pp. 105, 177; Panster v. Wasserman, 190 App. Div. 822, 823), or affect his “ standing, honesty and reliability ” in his business (Brown v. Tregoe, 236 N. Y. 497, 502), in which cases no special damages are required to be alleged or proven. This is one…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moore v. . FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Sanderson v. . CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charles Parker Co. v. Silver City Crystal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Kforce, Inc. v. Alden Personnel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Mildenberger v. FlemmingNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Phelan v. RheinsteinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1929