Legal Opinion
Kforce, Inc. v. Alden Personnel, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 23, 2003No. 03 Civ.4152 RWSPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendants Alden Personnel, Inc., Alden Associates, Inc., and Baret Upham (collectively, the “Defendants”), have moved to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Kforce, Inc., (“Kforce”) for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is granted.
Prior Proceedings
On January 6, 2001, Kforce commenced this action for compensatory and punitive damages for alleged defamatory harm to Kforce’s business reputation and a violation of New York’s General Business…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gregory v. DalyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Lino Celle and Radio Mindanao Network Usa, Inc. v. Filipino Reporter Enterprises Inc. And Libertito PelayoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Grayson v. Ressler & ResslerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Bildstein v. Mastercard International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Reed Construction Data Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Giuffre v. MaxwellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.