Legal Opinion

State v. Alpert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 1981No. 10-80-03817, CA 19032PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*817VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

The state appeals1 a pre-trial order allowing defendant’s motion to suppress property seized from defendant’s car following a stop for a traffic infraction. The issue is whether the police had probable cause to seize a small closed cosmetic case (compact) and a folded bank envelope they observed in plain view on the floorboard of the defendant’s car. The defendant moved to suppress "any and all evidence derived from a search or a seizure regarding the defendant’s vehicle, property and the defendant’s person * * *.”2 The trial court’s order allowed the defendant’s motion in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State v. CurrinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. AlpertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API