State v. Alpert
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*817VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
The state appeals1 a pre-trial order allowing defendant’s motion to suppress property seized from defendant’s car following a stop for a traffic infraction. The issue is whether the police had probable cause to seize a small closed cosmetic case (compact) and a folded bank envelope they observed in plain view on the floorboard of the defendant’s car. The defendant moved to suppress "any and all evidence derived from a search or a seizure regarding the defendant’s vehicle, property and the defendant’s person * * *.”2 The trial court’s order allowed the defendant’s motion in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. CurrinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. AlpertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.