Legal Opinion

Mayor of Cambridge v. Secretary of the Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 8, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

The plaintiffs — the mayor, the city council, and eleven registered voters of the city of Cambridge — seek relief in the nature of mandamus against the defendant, Secretary of the Commonwealth, which would invalidate the 2001 redistricting plan for the 160 representative districts of the House of Representatives in the Commonwealth. The plaintiffs maintain that St. 2001, c. 125, § 1 (the redistricting statute), which establishes the new districts, is unconstitutional under art. 101, as amended by arts. 109, 117, and 119 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth, because it…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Growe v. EmisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Brown v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Legislative Districting of the StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. In Re Legislative Districting of the StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API