Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Legislative Districting of the State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 26, 2002No. 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, Sept. Term, 2001Published

1DissentRaker, J.

“Despite the reality that redistricting is now almost always resolved through litigation rather than legislation, we are moved to emphasize the obvious: redistricting remains an inherently political and legislative — not judicial — task. Courts called upon to perform redistricting are, of course, judicially legislating, that is, writing the law rather than interpreting it, which is not their usual — and usually not their proper — role. Redistricting determines the political landscape for the ensuing decade and thus public policy for years beyond. The framers in their wisdom entrusted this…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API