Edmonds v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The trial court gave judgment against Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District, a public utility, in the sum of $750. The court further held that the ditch and canal which was built through plaintiff’s lands was carelessly and negligently operated and maintained, but granted a reasonable time within which to correct what it declared to be negligent and careless operation, and further provided that if the nuisance was not abated within a reasonable time the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction restraining and enjoining the defendant “from maintaining and operating said canal in a negligent and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Middelkamp v. Bessemer Irrigating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Farmers' Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Hamilton v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Robinson v. El Centro Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bendlage v. KohlsaatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.