Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1933No. Docket No. Sac. 4583PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The trial court gave judgment against Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District, a public utility, in the sum of $750. The court further held that the ditch and canal which was built through plaintiff’s lands was carelessly and negligently operated and maintained, but granted a reasonable time within which to correct what it declared to be negligent and careless operation, and further provided that if the nuisance was not abated within a reasonable time the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction restraining and enjoining the defendant “from maintaining and operating said canal in a negligent and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Middelkamp v. Bessemer Irrigating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Farmers' Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hamilton v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Robinson v. El Centro Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Bendlage v. KohlsaatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API