Bell v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge.
Thurston Paul Bell, pro se, has brought a proceeding under I.R.C. § 7609(b)(2)(a) to quash an administrative summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) to Provident Bank (“Provident”). Pending are: (1) Bell’s petition to quash (Paper No. 2); (2) the Respondents’ “Motion for Summary Denial of Petition to Quash and for Summary Enforcement of Summons” (Paper No. 6); (3) Bell’s motions to strike (a) all of the Respondents’ preceding filings (Paper No. 10) and (b) the Respondents’ Reply in support of their motion (Paper No.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- EEOC v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- McCammon v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Maxwell v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- McCammon v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Neilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.