Legal Opinion

Neilson v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 17, 2009No. Civil Action 08-2059(JDB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Plaintiff Kenneth James Neilson, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the United States, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and IRS Special Agent Mercedes Manzur in her official capacity, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, and the Right to Financial Privacy Act (“RFPA”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 3416 and 3418. Plaintiff alleges that defendants unlawfully issued third-party summonses to seven financial institutions requesting their records in connection with him, and he requests an injunction prohibiting defendants…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beaver v. Does 1-10District Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API