Legal Opinion

McCammon v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 5, 2008No. Misc. Action 08-340(CKK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Petitioner Julie K. McCammon brought the above-captioned miscellaneous action as a Petition to Quash an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) summons issued to a third-party recordkeeper for information related to her financial activities. The United States, a Respondent to the Petition, has filed a motion to dismiss Petitioner’s Petition to Quash, in which it argues that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because petitions to quash summonses issued to third-party recordkeep-ers must be filed in the judicial districts in which the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. Settles v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  3. Coalition for Underground Expansion v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. Caribbean Broadcasting System, Ltd. v. Cable & Wireless PLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. Gomez-Perez v. PotterSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCammon v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Maxwell v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Neilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Nevius v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Neilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API