Bristow v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
Prior to the 10th day of April, 1925, one Toby Bristow had been employed by the Mutual Lumber Company at Bucoda, Washington, for approximately two months. His regular hours of work were from 8:00 to 12:00 a. m., and from 1:00 to 5:00 p. m. On that morning, Bristow came to work in his automobile and repaired to the office, where a time clock was kept for the purpose of keeping the time of the employees. Bristow “punched” the clock at 7:25 a. m. He was employed as a “spotter” on the resaw. After punching the clock, he passed along the premises of his employer, going through the portion of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Zenor v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Carlson v. MockWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Islais Creek Reclamation District v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Rice v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Skeen v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Wabnec v. Clemons Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Hamilton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.