Legal Opinion
Cappadona v. Salman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*633The plaintiff’s complaint alleges various causes of action arising from certain home improvement work the plaintiff performed in Westchester County at the defendants’ residence. Administrative Code of the County of Westchester § 863.313 states, in pertinent part, that "[n]o person shall maintain, conduct * * * or engage in a home improvement business within the County of Westchester * * * unless such person is licensed pursuant to this article”. It is undisputed that the plaintiff did not have a home improvement contractor’s license under the Code.
The defendants subsequently moved to dismiss…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richards Conditioning Corp. v. OleetNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Millington v. RapoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Chosen Construction Corp. v. SyzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Ellis v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Hughes & Hughes Contracting Corp. v. CoughlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pepe v. TannenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Westchester Stone, Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. MarcellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- CMC Quality Concrete III, LLC v. IndrioloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- J.G. Cerasuolo Construction, Inc. v. TylerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Dickson v. BonistallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005