Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Newton's Administrator

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 11, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court Part II of the city of Richmond in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was brought by the administrator of William W. Newton, deceased, to recover of the defendant company damages for its alleged negligence in causing the' death of the plaintiff’s intestate. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for $10,000 against the defendant company, which this writ of error brings under review.

*262Considering the evidence, as must be done in this court, from the standpoint of a demurrer thereto, the following facts appear to be established: The decedent, a young man twenty-two years of age, was engaged with others, as an employee of the defendant, in painting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western R. v. AmpeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Norfolk & Western Railroad v. H. I. ShottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Norfolk & Western Railroad v. Nuckol's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Virginia & Southwestern Railway Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. Payne v. ZellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Gunter's Adm'r v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Wallen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  4. Lacks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  5. Atkinson v. NeblettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API