Legal Opinion

Daman v. Hunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1920No. Civ. No. 2072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John W. Shenk, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Plaintiff brought the action to quiet his title to certain lots in the town site of Howard, in the county of Los Angeles. Judgment was in favor of plaintiff for a portion of said lots and in favor of the intervener as to the balance thereof. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from that portion of the judgment which was in favor of the intervener, no question arising herein as to the other lots.

The complaint was filed on September 23, 1915-, and was in the usual form, alleging that defendant, Hunt, claimed some interest in the real property adverse to plaintiff. On February 16, 1916, H. W.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Williams v. AllisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Dunn v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  5. Shepard v. Heirs of CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Slater v. Shell Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Calhoun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Calhoun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API