Anheuser-Busch Companies v. Summit Coffee Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
BARBER, Justice.
This is, in part, a securities case. In our original opinion, we held that section 111 of the Securities Act of 1933 2 applied to private, secondary securities transactions such as the one at issue in this case. Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc. v. Summit Coffee Co., 858 S.W.2d 928 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1993, writ denied), judgm’t vacated, case remanded, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1309, 131 L.Ed.2d 192 (1995). We also noted that article 581-33(A)(2) of the Texas Securities Act was “arguably broader” than its federal counterpart, but did not reach the issue of whether it was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Flowers v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co. v. Interenergy Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Texas Capital Securities, Inc. v. Sandefer, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Quest Medical, Inc. v. ApprillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.