Legal Opinion

Anheuser-Busch Companies v. Summit Coffee Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 12, 1996No. 05-92-00389-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

BARBER, Justice.

This is, in part, a securities case. In our original opinion, we held that section 111 of the Securities Act of 1933 2 applied to private, secondary securities transactions such as the one at issue in this case. Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc. v. Summit Coffee Co., 858 S.W.2d 928 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1993, writ denied), judgm’t vacated, case remanded, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1309, 131 L.Ed.2d 192 (1995). We also noted that article 581-33(A)(2) of the Texas Securities Act was “arguably broader” than its federal counterpart, but did not reach the issue of whether it was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Flowers v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co. v. Interenergy Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Texas Capital Securities, Inc. v. Sandefer, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  3. In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
  4. Quest Medical, Inc. v. ApprillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API