Dana Ltd. v. Aon Consulting, Inc.

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.

In this case under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., and state tort and contract law, plaintiffs (collectively, “Dana”) allege that defendant, Aon Consulting, violated its fiduciary duties under ERISA by authorizing pension payments to ineligible recipients. Dana also asserts Aon, in failing to administer the plan properly, committed a host of torts and breached the parties’ contract.

Jurisdiction is proper under 29 U.S.C. § 1132 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a)(1) & 1367(a).

Pending is Aon’s partial motion to…