Legal Opinion
Perales v. Bowlin
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided July 23, 2009No. 1:09-cv-00138PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RUDY LOZANO, District Judge.
This matter is before the court sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915A. For the reasons set forth below, the court allows the Plaintiff to proceed against Defendant C. Daniels, in her individual capacity, for damages on his claim that she used excessive and unnecessary force on him during a pat-search while he was confined at the Elkhart County Jail, allows him to proceed against Defendant Bowlin on his claim that she “fondled” him during a pat-down search, and DISMISSES, pursuant to section 1915A, all other claims and Defendants.
BACKGROUND
G…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hernandez v. BattagliaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009