The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORIE L. PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
The United States brought this action against The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company to recover penalties for violations of § 1 of the Safety Appliance Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 1, 27 Stat. 531), which in part here pertinent reads:
“It shall be unlawful for any common carrier engaged in interstate commerce by railroad to use on its line any locomotive engine in moving interstate traffic not equipped with a power driving-wheel brake * *,
Section 8 of the Safety Appliance Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 8, 32 Stat. 943) provides that the provisions and requirements of § 1,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Southern Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joe E. Garcia v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. HaynesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Garcia v. Burlington Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987