Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 1, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant began employment as an Assistant District Attorney (hereinafter ADA) with the Suffolk County District Attorney’s office in 1991. In 1998 she became the ADA in charge of the office’s Gang Investigations Unit as its sole attorney. After a new District Attorney took office in 2002, the unit was expanded to include a second attorney, who was appointed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of EcklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of SchachtmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re the Claim of PenigianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In re the Claim of StandigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of YoungbloodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API