Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Penigian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 31, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment as an under butler valet without good cause. The record establishes that claimant resigned from her employment because she claimed that the employer spoke to her in a harsh manner and she was unhappy with her task…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MicaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of CioffiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re the Claim of ChipmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of YapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of JulianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API