O'Connell v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
Petitioner, appearing pro se, seeks review in the United States Court of Federal Claims of a special master’s dismissal of petitioner’s Petition for Compensation (Petition) under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (Vaccine Act or Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l to -25 (2000). In a decision filed May 28, 2004, the special master noted that petitioner’s claim, which alleged that a rubella vaccine caused his chronic arthritis,1 was initiated more than one year after the 36-month statutory deadline for filing his Petition had expired. O’Connell v. Sec’y of Health &…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Moreno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Lockwood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Roth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Eason v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.