Legal Opinion
DeWilliams v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 16, 2010No. 17-1147UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
BOBBY R. BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
For many years, and with resort to many different legal devices, petitioner-appellant Gary DeWilliams 1 has been trying to convince a court to overturn his 1988 federal conviction and twenty-five-year sentence for bank robbery and making a false statement. In this matter, nominally filed as a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, DeWilliams argues that the sentence for the 1988 conviction was invalid because it did not comply with the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, as amended by the Sentencing Act of 1987(SRA). The district court denied…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bradshaw v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Straley v. Utah Board of PardonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanchez-Penunuri v. LongshoreDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Castillo-Hernandez v. LongshoreDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Dewilliams v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. DeWilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014