Legal Opinion

Wilson v. California Health Facilities Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1980No. Civ. 47759PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

Emmett C. and Verna Wilson, as individuals and general partners in Monte Villa, a limited partnership, appeal from a judgment denying declaratory and injunctive relief and ordering them to comply with the financial reporting requirements of the California Health Facilities Disclosure Act (Health & Saf. Code, § 440 et seq.), 1 contending that section 442, subdivision (a) invades a zone of privacy protected by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and article I, section 1 of the state Constitution. For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Riese v. St. Mary's Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Coshow v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. St. Michael's Convalescent Hospital v. The State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Gregory v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Love v. State Dep't of Educ., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API