Osborne v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.
Jimmie D. Osborne appeals from various drug-related convictions, raising two points of appeal. He asserts that the trial court erred in not declaring Arkansas Code Annotated § 5-64-403 (Supp. 2003) 1 unconstitutionally vague and in denying his request to provide additional jury instructions. We are not persuaded by appellant’s arguments, and affirm his convictions.
Appellant was charged with Class B felony possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine under § 5-64-403(c)(5). At the beginning of appellant’s jury trial, he asserted that §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- L.H. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hinojosa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- Hinojosa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008