Legal Opinion

Osborne v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 1, 2006No. CA CR 05-267PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

Jimmie D. Osborne appeals from various drug-related convictions, raising two points of appeal. He asserts that the trial court erred in not declaring Arkansas Code Annotated § 5-64-403 (Supp. 2003) 1 unconstitutionally vague and in denying his request to provide additional jury instructions. We are not persuaded by appellant’s arguments, and affirm his convictions.

Appellant was charged with Class B felony possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine under § 5-64-403(c)(5). At the beginning of appellant’s jury trial, he asserted that §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. L.H. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hinojosa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Hinojosa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API