State ex rel. Hampel v. Mitten
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed March 15, 1938:
Fairchild, J.
It was the view of the trial court that the case was governed by State ex rel. Pelishek v. Washburn, 223 Wis. 595, 601, 270 N. W. 541; that in order to state a cause of action the complaint must show that the minds of the electors were so affected by the alleged false statements that the real will of the electors cannot be ascertained; that the election statistics affirmatively show that the will of the electors can be ascertained notwithstanding defendant’s alleged violation; and that therefore the complaint states no cause of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olson v. CunninghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. La Follette v. KohleeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Putnam v. BrowneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Singler v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- State ex rel. Pelishek v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thornton v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Bank v. EganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State v. MarshallAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Skibinski v. TadychWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Cook v. CorbettOregon Supreme Court · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.