Legal Opinion

Pueblo v. MacE

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 7, 1954No. 17510PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This matter refers to procedure for review with particular reference to Rules 111 and 112 (f), R.C.P. Colo.

On a number of occasions within recent months we have been called upon to apply the rules mentioned, and more especially Rule 112 (f) with reference to motions to strike transcripts which had not been lodged with the clerk of the trial court within the sixty-day period provided by the rule. In some of these instances we have taken the trouble to announce formal opinions. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 129 Colo. 1, 266 P. (2d) 400; Smith v. Woodall, 129 Colo.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Catlin v. VandegriftSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Neighbors of Woodcraft v. HildebrandtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  5. Smith v. WoodallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Corrections v. PenaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. Commercial Credit Corp. v. FrederickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Commercial Credit Corp. v. FrederickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Corrections v. PenaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API