Legal Opinion

Smith v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 17, 1954No. 17287PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The parties to this action are here in the same order as they appeared in the trial court, and we will herein refer to them as plaintiff and defendants.

This matter is here on, and relates only to, a motion to strike the reporter’s transcript. It is being dignified by a formal opinion only in the hope that we may hereby further stress the necessity of adherence to our rules.

Following trial to the court, judgment in favor of defendants was entered in said cause on July 31, 1953. Plaintiff, desiring to have the case reviewed, filed praecipe, pursuant to which writ of error was issued from our…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fraka v. MalerneeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Capitol Industrial Bank v. StrainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. Freeman v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Pueblo v. MacESupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  5. BUSINESS & PRODUCT PROMOTION, INC. v. East Tincup, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API