Legal Opinion

Catlin v. Vandegrift

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1914No. 8049PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Montrose District Court.—Hon. Thomas J. Black, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

*290The action was by defendant in error, "William Vandegrift, as plaintiff below, against one H. S. Hanthorne, in tbe County Court of Montrose County, to recover a commission alleged to be due plaintiff for a sale of real estate. Tbe complaint was filed February 10, 1912, and certain property of tbe defendant was attached. By stipulations between tbe parties tbe attached property was sold and tbe proceeds of sale placed in court to await tbe outcome of tbe cause. In August, 1912, tbe death of Hanthorne was suggested to the court, and tbe cause was continued in tbe name of Frank D. Catlin, Jr.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. KuhnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  2. Cates v. MackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  3. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Paonia Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Fuller v. Estate of FullerColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Bates v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Pueblo v. MacESupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  4. Lorthioir, as Admx. v. McLeodSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API