BMBT, LLC v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Utah
1DissentVoros, Judge
¶ 12 I respectfully dissent. On November 2, 2012, counsel for BMBT walked into a hearing on Defendants’ motion to bifurcate and walked out having had their complaint dismissed with prejudice. Defendants’ oral motion to dismiss was granted, and BMBT’s oral motion to amend was denied. The ruling was based on the trial court’s conclusion that the underlying documents created a security interest in the Property. The trial court acted decisively and perhaps — ulti*1176mately — correctly. But in my judgment the dismissal was premature because without resort to extrinsic evidence the documents are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Atlas Corp. v. Clovis National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Wilson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.