Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1994No. Cr. 930286Published

1Opinion of the Court

520 N.W.2d 796 (1994)

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Terry Darnell BROOKS, Defendant and Appellant.

Cr. No. 930286.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

August 24, 1994.

Stephen R. Dawson, Asst. State's Atty. (argued), Fargo, for plaintiff and appellee.

Bruce D. Johnson (argued), Fargo, for defendant and appellant.

NEUMANN, Justice.

Terry Darnell Brooks appeals from the verdict finding him guilty of the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. We reverse, holding that the trial court erred in not granting Brooks' motion for a new…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Meschke; Concurrence · Walle.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States v. Paul C. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API