Legal Opinion

Guisler v. Alexander

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1982No. 841PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The appeal in this case is from an order making absolute a rule to show cause why Paul and Ida Alexander should not be held in contempt for failing to pay an order for the support of their son. The order from which the appeal was filed, however, was not a final adjudication of contempt. It merely made absolute a rule to show cause why appellants should not be held in contempt and provided: “A hearing on the issue of the Defendants’ contempt shall be scheduled by the Court Administrator and held accordingly.” The order, on its face, discloses that it is interlocutory and not a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Magaziner v. MagazinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Kramer v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Crislip v. HarshmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Brodsky v. Philadelphia Athletic Club, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. GuardianiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McManus v. Chubb Group of InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Genovese v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Steel v. WeisbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. K.M.G. v. H.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Whitt v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API