Legal Opinion

Crislip v. Harshman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1976No. 792PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a lower court order holding appellant in contempt for failing to make court-ordered support payments. On appeal, appellant raises three issues. We find that the matter must be remanded for a further finding as to the wilfulness of the contempt.

A detailed review of all the background facts is not necessary to our immediate disposition of the case. It will suffice to note, appellant and appellee separated after nine years of marriage which produced four children. Appellee attempted, by recourse to The Pennsylvania Civil Procedural Support Law,1 to secure the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knaus v. KnausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Simmons v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wright v. HendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Barrett v. BarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sonder v. SonderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Lachat v. HinchliffeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Kramer v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Schnabel Associates, Inc. v. Building & Construction Trades CouncilSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Neshaminy Water Resources Authority v. Del-Aware Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API