Legal Opinion

Losada v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1970No. Docket 7,516PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Following the order of remand in Chrysler Corporation v. Losada (1965), 376 Mich 209, plaintiff’s claim for unemployment compensation was allowed by the referee; the appeal board reversed the referee and the circuit court affirmed the appeal board. We review to determine whether the appeal board’s decision was authorized by law and was supported by competent, material and substantial evidence on the whole record. Const 1963, art 6, § 28, Williams v. Lakeland Convalescent Center, Inc. (1966), 4 Mich App 477.

The decision of the appeal board was authorized by law if plaintiff was disqualified…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennington v. DudleyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In re the Claim of HeaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Chrysler Corporation v. LosadaMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Williams v. Lakeland Convalescent Center, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keith v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Keith v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Dueweke v. Morang Drive Greenhouses, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Dueweke v. Morang Drive Greenhouses, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API