Pennington v. Dudley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTaut, C. J.
As its only reasons for reversing the decision of the Board of Review, the judgment entry of the Common Pleas Court states generally that the board’s decision is “unlawful, unreasonable and against the manifest weight of the evidence.” Especially since this court is not required to and does not generally weigh evidence, it is reasonably arguable that this judgment entry might interfere with our consideration of the legal questions argued by the parties. However, prior to signing that judgment entry, the trial judge filed a written “decision” specifying the reasons for the judgment of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hessler v. American Television & Radio Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Commissioner of the Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- In re the Claim of HeaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- State v. GilkersonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Guillard v. Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re PotvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Keystone Steel & Wire Division v. Department of LaborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Craft General Contractors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Losada v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.